up in arms

emailed my senator today!

Dear Senator Boxer,

I’ve long believed in health care reform, and I’m happy to see that progress on that front is finally being made. However, I’m quite distressed at the inclusion of the so-called Stupak Amendment in the House version of the bill.

In the past few months of hearings and reports, it’s become increasingly clear that women are at a disadvantage in the health care market, and I would hope that any national health care reform legislation would take this into account and include provisions that would encourage gender equality in health care. However, instead we get the Stupak Amendment, which seriously limits access to abortion.

If, as Bart Stupak argued on *Hardball* last night, this amendment is the same as the Hyde Amendment, then why do we need it? It is in fact not the same, it’s far more restricting. And if, as some on the left have said, this amendment is the price we have to pay to push through health reform, then I think it’s time for the Democrats to stop and re-evaluate. How much are we on the left willing to sacrifice to push this bill through? Where is the line? Last week, Ed Rendell said in an interview that it was “stupid” to get all up in arms over one “peripheral” issue. It is not stupid for women to be upset when we see our elected leaders selling us down the river, selling us out on an issue that is not “peripheral,” but is in fact deeply important to many of us and has been for decades.

Furthermore, according to an article in *The Nation* (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20091116/lerner), the current version of the bill does not require insurers to cover basic gynecological care like regular pelvic exams and birth control.

As a woman I resent the continued implications throughout this debate that women’s issues don’t matter. These issues don’t just affect women, and the continuing ghettoization and dismissal of women’s issues only points to the gender inequality that still exists in our society.

When the healthcare bill comes before the Senate, I would encourage you to do all you can to include better provisions for women’s health care, and to remove the Stupak Amendment from it. In fact, I think the Stupak Amendment is one of those issues that should be a dealbreaker: there’s compromise that leads you to accept what you can get rather than getting nothing, and then there is compromise that is really failure. Please don’t sell women out; we deserve better than that.

Thank you for your time. 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s