More People Being Dumb About Sesame Street

For whatever reason I can’t get enough of this topic. Here’s an example of an email sent to the PBS ombudsman (who in my estimation is being far too even-handed about this. I suppose there’s a reason I never found work as a public editor.)

I was incredibly disappointed in PBS and the Sesame Street episode aired on October 29, 2009. The parody of Oscar acting as an obvious Fox reporter was truly a new low. Even more shocking was the mention of Fox News as “trashy.” I will never watch Sesame Street again and find it pathetic that you would use it as a platform for pushing the White House message and apparent conflict with Fox. I am a Fox News watcher and PBS children’s show watcher. Some things should not mix. I refuse to let children’s programming brainwash my child into certain political views. It is not right and should be addressed. Having conservative views is not a bad thing and I plan to raise my children to think for themselves and not listen to radical liberal thought. It is not right. Save it for the NewsHour and not Sesame Street.

Andrea Tarr, New Boston, NH

What Andrea Tarr – Concerned Mother and Dumb Person, NB NH – fails to realize is that Oscar was working for GNN. Apparently changing a single letter in a news org’s acronym has an effect that is not unlike Superman donning a pair of glasses. At any rate, my point is that whatever insults she perceived PBS as making toward Fox were actually directed at CNN with the sole exception of the “trashy” pun. It also bears pointing out that this is a re-air of an episode from 2007, so she is once again projecting her current perception of the “President’s agenda” onto an episode that dates to a time where the President would’ve been hostile to CNN if anything. You see what you want to see.

ps. Speaking of single-letter changes, I know that I personally wouldn’t have hesitated to call Andrea harsher names like stupid, moron, idiot, etc. if her name was Andrew instead. I almost skipped the obligatory personal slam entirely but I figured that would be morally inconsistent and settled on “Dumb Person” as a compromise. I think the sentiment is idiotic but I hesitate to call a woman who expresses it the same. Is this a form of sexism?

  1. i think it’s more a reaction to sexism. as an Enlightened Male, you are of course aware of the history of sexism in our culture, and you would not want to be seen as making personal attacks based on a person’s gender. you are probably being overly cautious, but it’s understandable.

    now, since i’m also a lady, i can call her a dumb twatwaffle if a want to, and it’s not really sexist (although it’s certainly also not classy, but come on, “twatwaffle” is a great word).

  2. fauxpopuli said:

    Hm, I like that explanation. It lets me off the hook.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s